Amplify Amplify Amplify

When you take a look around, when you look hard at your own village, town, or city, there's a lot going on. In particular there's a lot going on that I would describe as creative endeavour. You'll find painters and poets and novelists and print makers and designers and photographers and inventors and cabinet makers and sculptors and wood turners and vintage car restorers and gardeners and experimental chefs and mural painters and dancers and guitarists and timpanists and .... yeah, there's a lot going on. 

However all of us can all too easily fall under that 'fug' of feeling and thinking in which we think our world is not very creative, and that we are not very creative, because unless you are a part of that scene, or unless you actively go looking, you mostly don't see it.

Often on a daily basis we pass by the material evidence of this, with murals and sculptures in public spaces, or we might occasionally see a small media piece of a writers' workshop or something similar. And this is all part of the 'creative vibe' of any place in which we live. But I wonder how often we recognise it as such?

In politics we are now seeing an extreme example of the old lesson about repetition: if you say something often enough, whether truth or lie, people come to believe that it is so. Sadly we are seeing this all too often in the repetition of lies that are intended to create division, to appeal to some very base human instincts, in order to support someone's hunger for power. It is repetition based on a complete lack of moral imperative.

I have, during the course of experience in leading two schools, found that if you simply take what already goes on, are deliberate and intentional in giving those stories their creative spin, and tell the stories as widely as possible, you can influence a culture. You can raise awareness, you can get people to go 'oh wow yes, hadn't thought of that'. You can get people thinking about creativity, about what it looks like in their daily lives, in their daily mahi. You can build a creative vibe.

What if we harnessed this behaviour in support of the growth of creative and learning cities? What if we took what is already happening in our villages, towns, and cities, and kept talking about it, all the time? What if we were far more deliberate and intentional in telling our creative stories, and our learning stories, using social media as the amplification tool of the moment? Could we influence a city in this way? Could we convince people that they live in creative and learning focussed cities?

As I was part the way through writing this, the following piece appeared in the Star News (click on the link in the photo caption).

Source: https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-christchurch/mini-melbourne-christchurch-nzs-new-capital-cool

This is the creative vibe' I have been talking about, and this media piece is the sort of thing that builds the perception, and therefore the reality, of a creative city. After all, our perception is our reality, isn't it.

And why am I 'banging on' about a creative city? Because I have the opinion that a creative city is a learning city is a creative city is a learning city is a ... you get the idea. These are, I 'reckon', reinforcing concepts. The 'Manaiakalani kaupapa' with it's 'Learn Create Share' pedagogy shows us that creativity can be central to learning, and the work of Professor Peter O'Connor and so many others shows the impact on learning and wellbeing of taking a creative lens. Evidence shows for example that learning through a creative lens amplifies reading and writing for children.

There are so many opportunities. Take for example Jason Marsden, Centre Manager, at The Hub. He is delightfully passionate about connecting with the community and about being authentic. He initiated an 'artist in residence' at The Hub a few years ago, bringing creativity and creative opportunities to the local community. He's also a creative himself. Imagine what could happen if EVERY mall in the city did this. Imagine if every shopping mall hosted a' 'artist in residence'. What impact might that have?

There are a number of small entrepreneurial operators offering creative opportunities for young and old alike, whether 'Egg Academy', or Risingholme, or... far too many to name. What would happen if every mall in the city took it on itself to promote one of these operators every year, to have them operate within the 'public' spaces of the mall? Imagine the potential impact.

Perhaps the key word is 'IMAGINE'.... we don't allow ourselves to do that often enough.

The challenge is how to amplify the message, how to keep all of this wonderful creative mahi and energy, in front of as many people as possible, as often as possible. 

This perhaps is some of the most important work of Ako Ōtautahi - Learning City Christchurch. AO-LCC is not a creator in the sense that it conceives and runs events etc, but rather a connector and an amplifier. The Trustees know the Gestalt that 'the whole is more than the sum of the parts'. 

Going back to my experience in principalship, one of many things I think I learned is that you can change perceptions by focussing on the positive, by focussing on the great things that happen. One of the odd things about we humans is that if our 'information space isn't filled with positive news, we will most probably fill it with the negative.  We all have that 'negative voice' in the back of our heads. We have to drown the negative out with positive ideas and thoughts. Our perception is our reality. So our challenge is, much like the principle of 'self talk', to flood the media spaces with positive stories of creativity and learning. We need to leverage off our many networks, social media and otherwise, with consistent and coherent messaging. We need to make sure that everyone from Frank and Lyn in Aranui to Hemi and Helen in Cashmere know about this. We can't afford to let a single drop of human creativity and potential go to waste.

We have to AMPLIFY AMPLIFY AMPLIFY.

Being constant and relentless: our words matter

Way way back in my late teens and early twenties I served in the Territorial Army, 1 Squadron, NZ Scottish Regiment to be precise. We drove those M113 Armoured Personal Carriers. It wasn't all marching, in fact was a lot of fun. But soldiers were always 'marched' from one place to another. When in a more formal 'camp' situation an NCO would take command of the squad to march us from one place to another, and as NCOs we learned the skill of commanding a squad. 

Source: https://natlib.govt.nz/records/22712622

You would call out commands (obviously), like "'eft 'ight 'eft 'ight 'eft 'ight eeefffft" (that's quite difficult to write down phonetically, but you get the idea). You would also call out what might be called 'coaching commands' like "heads up, swing those arms straight through front to rear" and so on. If you didn't, then the marching could become quite slovenly, and the moment you did you could see the members of the squad up the ante, pick up their game, stand tall, and it often applied regardless of how experienced the squad members were. I'd hasten to add that when 'on parade', on the parade ground, it was different. You knew you had to put in your best effort then, otherwise you'd be answering to some towering Regimental Sergeant Major who would tear you limb from limb (figuratively speaking).

I think that in anything in life we all need that little bit of coaching to remind us what to do, regardless of how experienced we are. I was reminded of this recently. In my Acting Principal role I have spoken often about creativity, about it's importance, about its impact, about the need to take risks if we are to be creative, and about the need to model risk taking and creativity with our learners if we want them to be creative too. I've tried to model one way in which that might look with staff.

As this piece of my own mahi comes to an end, I received a lovely email from a colleague, in which they said this:

"Your reminders to be creative have reignited something I’d lost too and for that I’m grateful. The creativity had gotten lost in all the other stuff but it’s back and I’ll make sure it stays."

Working in schools is tiring and demanding, messy, and chaotic at times. It's easy to forget those things that perhaps brought us to the profession. It's easy to lose sight of the 'essential us'. We can lose them in the fog of busyness and fatigue. It's easy to forget the need to feed our own selves, to feed our own sense of creativity. Without that, it's hard to see how we could or would nurture creativity amongst our learners.

Source: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/creativity-in-school-education/80737187

One feature of my attempts at leadership has been to try to be deliberate and intentional, constant and relentless, in voicing what I think is important, about how I think we can make the biggest difference. Also I always try to keep the number of different messages as small as possible. You can't do it all at once. I hasten to add that I try to ensure that my views are evidence informed, not simply 'random reckons'. There may be a little too much of that in our profession at times.  

 

Creativity and pedagogy

I've been working out at Darfield High School in mid Canterbury in term 3, standing in for the awesome Andy while he takes a well deserved sabbatical. It has meant the inevitable Newsletter columns, in which I have often espoused the case for creativity in schools. Here is this week's missive which I thought had wider relevance than just the Darfield community. 

I remember back in the ‘80’s (yes, I am that old) when I was working in the not-for-profit sector, and often had interactions with accountants. At about that time, if I remember correctly (and yes memory is indeed a dodgy thing), the Society of Accountants changed the university requirements for accountants. They required students to take at least one paper in their degrees that was NOT from the accounting area of the university curriculum. Take some art history, or some music, a language or a science or …. they said. I reckoned this was in recognition that maybe the stereotype of accountants that seemed to rule at the time had some basis in truth. Maybe. Maybe not. The point was that for accountants to do their job effectively they needed breadth in their learning and in their lives beyond just profit and loss statements and balance sheets. They needed a broader understanding of the world in which they worked, in which their business clients worked. They also needed the ability to better understand the nature of the businesses they served, and to be able to think more critically and creatively about all of those things in order to better advise and serve their clients.

I recently saw this sentiment in a meme that popped up on my Facebook feed:

“The true purpose of arts education is not necessarily to create more professional artists. (It’s) to create more complete human beings who are critical thinkers, who have curious minds, who can lead productive lives.”

I’ve heard it said that if we want better scientists, better managers, better engineers, better farmers etc then we need to ensure some exposure to the arts in school in whatever shape or form children and teens like. I’d go that step further and say that everyone benefits from the explicit inclusion of a focus on creativity. That will give us better scientists, better managers, better engineers, better farmers.

Which brings me to the education ‘P’ word: pedagogy. It’s a bit of a silly word, a piece of education jargon which just means ‘how we cause learning’. The refreshed AotearoaNZ curriculum (the refresh started several years ago) contains, for the first time that I can ever recall, an explicitly stated ‘pedagogy’: ‘Understand, Know, Do’. That is, it outlines a consistent and intentional framework for how schools and teachers will cause learning. It’s not a linear or sequential thing, and the fact that it includes the word ‘Know’ tells us that it places importance on ‘knowing stuff’ (about which many of you will breathe a sigh of relief, as do many teachers). ‘Knowing’ stuff might come from direct instruction (Hattie identifies this as still having a large effect size. That is, it’s still regarded as highly effective), or it might come from doing, which might be as simple as repetitive practice of exercises, or it could come from the act of creation. In education we do need to shift our practice to embrace a far wider range of ‘doing’ activities.

As an aside, that does leave us with the question of what we mean by ‘knowledge’. To most of us it probably means having recall from our own brains of facts, formulae, processes etc. In 2005 Jane Gilbert, researcher with NZ Council for Education Research, published a book called ‘Catching the knowledge wave’ in which she said that knowledge is now a verb, not a noun—something we do rather than something we have. That is, while we still need to have recall of facts, ideas, and processes, that’s no longer enough. She was saying that ‘knowledge’ is having that information in our brains, AND doing something with it. We want people who think creatively and critically about that ‘stuff’. You can’t think in a vacuum. You need to know stuff to be able to think about it.

What also matters is that the school’s pedagogy is made obvious for everyone (Tumuaki/Principals, teachers/kaiako, and learners/ako and whānau alike). It needs to be very visible for everyone to see, and teachers need to constantly ’unpack’ what it means and what it could look like.

In my previous principalship I lived, worked, and breathed, a slightly different pedagogy. That it was different doesn’t matter. What mattered was that we knew what it was, we knew how we did things in that kura, and we were deliberate and intentional in thinking about it, in unpacking it, in using it, to the benefit of all learners. And it worked!!!!!

My point is that this pedagogy (Understand, Know, Do) values creative thinking, and it values it across the whole curriculum, across the entire ‘lived experience’ of every learner.  That might be through an arts course, but it equally might be anywhere across the learning experiences of learners in every kura, every kura kaupapa, every ECE. This is visionary stuff. If we value creativity, if we are deliberate and intentional in making it a part of the experience of every learner, then one likely outcome is that we will indeed get even better scientists, even better managers, even better engineers, even better farmers. 

I’m all for that.

How digitisation of government services could be anti democratic

I am privileged to be a trustee on three education focussed trusts in Ōtautahi Christchurch.

I wouldn't describe myself as a 'high value' trustee, there are others on each Board that do a heap more work, add a heap more value, than I do. However I make the occasional useful contribution, I hope. The three trusts have two things in common: they are each focussed on education and learning in some way, shape, or form, and each of them is working to address the issue of the digital divide that we have in Aotearoa New Zealand, the gap that exists between that 'haves' and the 'have nots' in terms of access to the online digital world. Each trust engages in different mahi but with this same end in mind. You wouldn't be surprised then to read me say that I too think that digital equity is important. Access to the online digital world is empowering, liberating, humanising, and wealth creating. These are benefits that we ALL ought to be able to hold as a right, regardless of birth, race, culture, or geographical location.

You have most probably seen this image many times, reflecting how I too see this world.

This is all background to last week's thinking, having just read a piece in The Listener (August 24-30 2024) titled  'Citizen Drain'. The piece was about funding for Citizens' Advice Bureaus around the motu, but it was the part about digital access that really 'spun my wheels' (in a very negative way). In recent years I have been one of those confronting the increasing digitisation of government services, but from my relatively privileged position as as someone used to this environment, and someone with the resources to continue to own the technology to access those services in that way. I confess to having been sheltered to some degree from the impact of this strategy on those less privileged than me. This part in particular is of interest:

I've copied the article in its entirety at the bottom of this post (noting that there is no intention to contravene the copyright of The Listener in any way, and in fact if you don't have a subscription I heartily recommend taking one out).

I have to confess that despite my relative privilege with regards to digital access, I have experienced my own moments of frustration and disempowerment when attempting access to some of those government services.

Couple this with the latest cost cutting measures that see finding for support for digital learning in schools, and this could look something like a perfect storm. Here is a link to some thinking from Derek Wenmoth from June 2024.

In my opinion, this stacks up as an incredibly anti-democratic thing. Forcing the population to access government services digitally, and then attacking the means by which that population is able to grow the skills, and the software/hardware capability, to access those services, is surely about as disempowering as it gets (trumped .. no pun intended.. only by such things as attacks on women's' reproductive rights, or LGBTQ rights, or suggestions of 'stolen elections' ... etc).

I'd always thought it was the role of government to protect the population, to enable people to live good fulfilling lives in safety. In my book, that has to include access to the full range of government services.

This all means that the work of these three trusts, and the many others in Aotearoa New Zealand that work hard every day to support the disadvantaged, is doubly important. The fact that these are charitable trusts means that they often receive very little government funding, and currently most probably even less. The future is looking shaky not only for the trusts, but for the people whom they attempt to serve.

https://natlib.govt.nz/records/22703273

We must double down in our efforts to support digital equity for the people mof Aotearoa New Zealand.

Here is the Listener article in full.

Maybe creative schools coud lead to creative cities?

I'm currently back in 'work harness' as Acting Tumuaki at Darfield High School, covering sabbatical leave for  awesome Tumuaki Andy England. One of many things that has struck me about the kura (all positive, I hasten to add) is the clear rich arts tradition. I enjoyed their bi-ennial major production last week (Little Shop of Horrors) and as I walk around, the visual arts tradition is equally clear. Some of the work has been made by the members of the community, but equally some has been made by students.

Referring back to some of my thinking previously about creative cities, similarly you can create a 'creative vibe' in a school. In that school environment it is of course much easier - it is smaller, and there is much more direct control of the environment. It does however still take deliberate and intentional acts if it is to happen. In the school context it takes inspirational teachers too, and... it takes inspirational teachers who feel empowered to act, to do, to support, to nuture, and feed, student creativity, and to be creative themselves. It requires courageous leadership that is single minded in its focus. It takes leadership that empowers teachers and learners (you'd hope all teachers are learners, of course) to engage their creativity, to feed it, whether in the art room or the science lab, the social studies room or on the footie field.

And lots of schools like this in and around a city must surely mean that the life of the city itself is impacted. Most schools have lots of art work around, that's not unique. How about we show it off more, how about we talk about it more, how about we showcase it more, how about we celebrate it more? 

There is a problem there though.. wherever we are, wherever we live, wherever we work or play, it is easy to stop noticing these things in our environment. The secret is to open our eyes every day at the wonder that is all around, to see a new every single day those things that we have seen every other day.

We have to lift our view, open our eyes, and sit and stare for a while, we need to dare to daydream, all of us, school students included.

Sounds a little 'Pollyanna'ish' I guess, but it works.

Library entrance foyer

Library mural

A piece of outdoor art

The entrance foyer to the kura

Some outstanding Level 1 (Year 11) art work on display behind the reception desk

Maybe more creative schools in and arounbd a city could indeed lead to more creative cities. It doesn't exactly sound like rocket science, does it. I haven't been here long enough to have too much of an insight into things in this regard, and won't be here long enough - it's only a term. But .. e hika mā.. what a delightful leg in life's journey so far.

Creativity somewhere along the space/time continuum?

I'm not saying memories are always completely accurate, eh. I guess they could more correctly be described as a scattering of crumbs and the readings and interpretations we place on events at the time, and in the space of time that has passed since. However I do have memories of being in school. And amongst those memories (which are often far from positive) is being told on numerous occasions 'Sutton, stop daydreaming and get on with your work'. Did that actually happen? In my head it did, and also in my stock of memories from my professional life is recollection of seeing and hearing teachers say much the same thing to students.

We seem to be taught at an early age that busyness is equated with productivity, and that if we sit idly we are wasting our time. One of the many things I am grateful for from my upbringing is that I had parents who did not peddle that message of busyness. As growing boys we were allowed to sit, to lounge, to daydream.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Thinker,_Auguste_Rodin.jpg

In my professional life I came to increasingly enjoy wandering through the visual arts spaces where I would see students sitting, in silence, staring up to the heavens, the long eyed stare. Yes they were daydreaming. Was that a bad thing? I  don't think so. Even if they were not thinking about the task in front of them, they were engaged with their internal selves, they were listening to their internal dialogue, feeling and being alone. That process needs space and time. In this age of 'always on' in which devices and social media mean that we crave connectedness within the false construct of 'social media friends', it is surely never a bad thing to sit alone, with oursleves, for a while?

So what? Having returned to work full time for a term, I've been reminded of something very fundamental about creativity: if it is to truly prosper, it needs time and space. It's not a 'space time continuum', it's not a trade off, an either/or in which you position yourself somewhere along the line. In my temporary return to this full time work status I find I have far less time to dream and invent, and to write poetry. My output is stalled (those who bother to read it might well claim that this is not a bad thing .. Douglas Adams' description of Vogon poetry might well be apt here). I'm not saying that it has stopped the creative process. But it gets in the way.

If we go with the notion that creativity is an implicit part of being human, I wonder if it is too long a draw of the bow to suggest that solitude, the need for space and time, is part of being human? Does it nurture our humanity in the same way that it nurtures creativity?

And what then do we take from the latest prognostications from on high suggesting that the arts and music can take a back seat in our schools? What interpretations are we left with?

It feels a lot like 'what could the common people possibly need creativity for, they don't need to make any sort of connection with their humanity?'. And if going hand in hand with creativity is this notion of curiosity, is this seen as a threat to political control of a population? After all, a curious population is one less likely to bend to political manipulation and control, isn't it?

Maybe I'm too readily buying into some sort of Marxist class war conspiracy. Maybe our politicians are simply uninformed, maybe they are spouting their own political dogma in their political echo chamber. Whatever the reason, our world will be the poorer for it.

Give me the dreamers any day.

Here is a link to a nice collation of some thoughts on 'aloneness and creativity'. 

Creativity needs both time and space if it is to flourish. It doesn't exist along a space/time continuum, as that suggetss it is almsot binary in nature. Rather than an either/or, it is surely an and/and? I'll try to find more time to just sit and daydream.

Fostering curiosity in a city

As the Trustees of Ako Ōtautahi - Learning City Christchurch, in our deliberations, our kōrero, our hui,  the word 'curiosity' keeps coming up. And with jolly good reason. Curiosity is perhaps one of the most primal and powerful survival instincts of our species, and perhaps of all life forms. 

"One way to begin exploring curiosity is to understand ‘information seeking’. This behavior is observable across the entire animal kingdom – from apes and dolphins all the way down to crabs and tiny nematode worms. ‘Information seeking’ means that every animal seeks information about their environment. This is so they know how to navigate it. In fact, it’s why sensory organs exist – to supply the brain with information that helps you understand your environment and make better choices." (Source: https://curiosity.britannica.com/science-of-curiosity)

I spent quite some time down a rabbit hole searching for what has been written about curiosity, it's benefits, and its connections with creativity. GoogleScholar is a wonderful thing, as is the Google search operator 'site:edu'. I have to confess that I didn't even scratch the surface, but in the process of skimming through a lot of material several things became apparent.

Curiosity offers many benefits for learning, and for our lives as human beings.

"A study published in Neuron last fall about the science of curiosity confirmed that when people are curious, they:

• Learn more
• Remember better
• Absorb incidental material (the boring stuff) better than they ordinarily would

An article by Todd Kashdan in Experience Life magazine summarizes other research showing that curiosity is a leading contributor to better health, intelligence, relationships, and happiness. (my emphasis).." (Source: https://blog-youth-development-insight.extension.umn.edu/2015/06/making-curiosity-happen.html) 

That has echoes of the work of Professor Peter O'Connor ('Replanting creativity in post normal times').

Curiosity is also beneficial in supporting, promoting, and developing creativity.

"There is a strong connection between creativity and curiosity. Curiosity is the
foundation for creative people, creative process, and creative environment to foster
innovation. To evaluate how curiosity stimulates creativity, this project explored the
nature of curiosity and the role in creativity. " Source: https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=creativeprojects )

I had taken a lot of this for granted, admittedly not a good way to enter into any inquiry, but it was a belief based on a lot of previous reading and work. The question with which I had begun this search  was this: is it possible to promote or develop a curious and creative city, or is it possible to build a culture of creativity and curiosity in a city?

To cut to the chase, I gathered some interesting material, although it may take some more thinking/processing to come up with strategies that make this all work.

In a 2021 book 'Restorative Cities', Professor Jenny Roe, Director of the Center for Design & Health in the School of Architecture, University of Virginia, writes of the idea of restorative streets in urban design:

"As one example – the design of ‘restorative streets’ that can boost mental health – might include:

• Multiple uses and facilities, a mixture of all kinds of residences, workplaces, shops, cafes and restaurants that bring people out on the street at all times of day;
• Urban greenery and street trees that are so strongly linked with restorative mental health;
• The inclusion of ‘fascinating’ shopfront facades, and other attributes of street design that promote curiosity and wonder (such as public art, green walls, murals);
• Safe ‘bumping’ places where people can mix and mingle on an impromptu basis; dog walking areas, street chess, mini-markets and food stalls, for example.
• Comfortable streets that restrict vehicular access and promote walkability and other modes of active travel including cycling." (Source: https://engagement.virginia.edu/node/5806)

 In a paper submitted in 2006 for her Masters Degree ('Curious About Curiosity?'  Buffalo State College) Sharon Walsh  suggested the following personal steps that in her opinion would develop curiosity:

• Be observant
• Have a sense of wonderment and awe (sounds a little like Art Costa's 'Habits of mind')
• Be more curious, ask questions
• Judge your judgement
• Make the familiar strange, and the strange familiar
• Be surprised, and surprise others

She concludes:

"There are many techniques to help encourage curiosity. It is helpful to consider

engaging curiosity from the perspective of people, process and environment. An

important component to encouraging curiosity is opening oneself to the creative process

through being more curious, judging judgment and (sic) playing with concepts and

ideas. Taking a childlike sense of awe and wonder about the world and being more 

observant is an avenue to igniting one's curiosity. Another technique for encouraging

curiosity is to surprise yourself and others.. "

In a blog post titled 'Making curiosity happen' written in 2016, Jessica Pierson Russo of the University of Minnesota, suggested that the following three things promote the development of curiosity:

• Build knowledge
• Thrive on uncertainty
• Play
• See the extraordinary in the ordinary

She also wrote:

"I can think of other strategies that may be useful in strengthening curiosity as a skill—for instance, nurturing failure as a welcome part of the creative process. Failure should be taught as a good thing (rather than something to be avoided at all costs) in relation to learning and building curiosity. But the main strategy that I would advocate for in building curiosity is teaching it intentionally as a necessary life skill that we can develop. Each of us tends to exercise these strategies, at least unconsciously, at one point or another. But when we use them intentionally, we begin to create valuable habits that ultimately result in stronger minds and better learning experiences" (Source: https://blog-youth-development-insight.extension.umn.edu/2015/06/making-curiosity-happen.html)

This notion of nurturing failure, of celebrating the need for risk taking in the creative process, I have found to be recognised across many sources.

I came across a number of other papers that said quite similar things. If we are to assume that these are correct, then the question is 'are these strategies scaleable across a city?' 

One conclusion I have come to yet again is that cities that have a 'creative vibe'  are more likely to be cities that foster curiosity and therefore creativity.  I have written about this several times before.

Just today I read of a new 'green space' popping up in the central Christchurch CBD, and have seen yet more street art appearing (or maybe it's just that I am 'seeing' it for the first time). There are plenty of other Ōtautahi Christchurch examples in previous posts.

And Christchurch is forward in developing those alternative spaces where creativity can be nurtured, where it can thrive. There is the SALT district:

"SALT is the gritty, Southern ALTernative to the glossier city core. Laced with laneways and centred around St Asaph, Lichfield & Tuam streets, it’s a character destination where cool people with big ideas make amazing things happen."

 A part of this development is the 'Boxed Quarter':

"BOXed Quarter is a melting pot of art, music and hospitality located directly opposite Ara Institute and deep within the rapidly emerging SALT District. "

One of many questions I have in my head is 'how does this impact the lives of whānau who live in poverty, who battle addictions, abuse, and privations generally'? That is, how does this impact the lives of our most vulnerable? You could easily respond that it can't, it won't, that this is not the right tool for the job. It's just that if a part of our vison for a learning city is a drive for equity, I can't help thinking that those whnau ought to be a part of this. After all, surely every one of those human beings has creative potential that could benefit us all? Every one of those human beings deserves to live their best life?

I am of the opinion that developers and city planners in Ōtautahi are doing their bit. They are doing what they can to give us an environment that is conducive to growing curiosity and creativity. What next?